Feinstein
is guilty of a last minute Borking sexual harassment hatchet job
A
letter the contents not disclosed but believed to be a sexual harassment incidence
lob
Against
Kavanaugh when he was in high school four decades ago
Even
if true which is doubtful, to paraphrase Sen. Baker the question is what and when
did of this incicent Rep Eschoo or Feinstein
know
Prior
to the hearing or during her meetings with him or during the hearings to
confirm to be held back as damaging ammo?
Supposedly
a letter from someone connected with Stanford who heard the victim or
participant on the incident expound
To
hold in reserve to prove based on an incident four decades ago he as a justice
is today unsound
No
questions have been asked of his youthful experiences as a teen with the
opposite sex
40
years ago the meaning of no means no was a view not uniformly what society would
totally accept
So
there is no perjury trap
Only
an attempt by the Blues to create a confirmation gap
No,
this is a rumor based on hearsay not admissible in the court of public opinion or
a court of law
A
desperate attempt by Feinstein to beat back DeLeon because she exhibited
courtesy which to the left is a fatal flaw
No
judge or politician going back into the person’s childhood or teen past
Is
completely without a perceived fault that with hypocrisy merits a sanctimonious
gasp
Time
to end this mockery and bias and vote to confirm
To
sit on the SCOTUS bench for this year’s fall term
© September 13, 2018 Michael P. Ridley
No comments:
Post a Comment