New York Times Editorial Board Endorses Clinton--What A Crock

As a poet normally on the New York Times endorsement I  would comment in rhyme
But given the tone of this editorial the comments are in prose this time
From the mantra of all the news that's fit to print, the Times has fallen into the gutter and stench of only the news that is slanted so far to the left and so coated with bias it has become only the news that is not worth the print to  read. Hillary Clinton is a felon and only because of the protection of Obama and Lynch has she not been indicted.
She has lied to the American public over her server, lied to Congress, the American people, and the families of the four dead Americans on Benghazi, and lied to the FBI over the server and has destroyed evidence that probably would have shown not her yoga schedules but the quid pro quo scandals of her tenure at the Secretary of State while her husband was milking millions upon millions of dollars from foreign governments and corporations seeking favors. Is this the role model we want as president, a paranoid, secretive, nontransparent, deceptive liar whose record as Secretary was a complete disaster and as a Senator was nonexistent? If the Times had a nanogram of objectivity the answer would be clearly no. Trump may have his warts but he is head and shoulders far better than a tired more of the same old woman who has nothing to run on other than she is a woman and can with lightening speed play the ill-conceived false race card and misogynist card. Shame on your editorial board!